Market Misinterprets Bellus’ Promising Phase 1 Data

Bellus had a call this morning (listen here) to discuss their Phase 1 data, released yesterday after market.

As reported yesterday, at their anticipated therapeutic doses (50-100mg), there was only 1/24 patients (4.2%) who reported a taste alteration, which was described as mild-moderate. This 1 patient, at the 100mg dose, reported 2 episodes of taste alteration on day 1 and then none on the other 6 days.

The remaining taste events occurred at supra-therapeutic doses (200mg-1200mg), which the company does not anticipate being the treatment dose.



To compare, Merck’s Phase 3 P2X3 candidate showed 48% of patients had taste alteration (vs Bellus 4.2%). Additionally, Bellus’ two taste events were described as “mild-moderate”, whereas 40% of Merck’s patients reported their taste effect was “very or extremely bothersome”.

Although this is not a direct apples-to-apples comparison (7 day vs 12 week duration), it supports Bellus’ candidate as showing promising early signs of not having taste side effect.



Next Step: Phase 2 in Mid-2019 
Bellus will be starting their Phase 2 crossover study in mid-2019. This trial will enroll 50 chronic patients in the US/UK and test 5 dose levels. We believe these will be 25, 50, 100, 200, 400 mg.

The company anticipates that the therapeutic dose will be between 50-100mg. Given that BLU-5937 is more potent than gefapixant, and that Merck’s Phase 3 dosing is 15mg/45mg, we think Bellus’ projection is accurate. This bodes well for taste side effects, which were less than 5% (shown above) in the sub-200mg doses.

The company anticipates the Phase 2 cross over study will cost approximately CAD$7M. They ended September with CAD$18M, so will have sufficient cash until 2020.

Reasons Bellus Down 15% Today
Although reported data was better than expected, Bellus is trading down 15% today. Here’s why we think this is happening and our thoughts:

  1. One case of increased liver enzyme levels

Bellus reported that 1 patient at the 400mg dose had liver enzyme levels above the upper normal limit. ALT was 4.1x the upper limit normal and AST was 2.2x. This occurred in only 1 patient and at a dose that is not expected to be therapeutic dose. Importantly, this was not significant enough to impair the liver function. Merck’s candidate also showed similar increase in liver enzymes at a dose above the therapeutic (600mg). We don’t think this is a material enough issue to warrant a 20% drop.  

  1. Next catalyst is ways out

The next clear catalyst is in mid-2020 with Phase 2 readout. The company is sufficiently funded until then and we doubt they will do a raise at sub-$100M valuation. Bellus will need to ensure funding for 2021 and onward, but we don’t think that is a near term risk at these valuation levels. We anticipate a Nasdaq uplisting in the near future and more analyst coverage as the company looks to set up funding for Phase2b in 2019 or at higher valuations.  

Bottom Line: Bellus data was strong. The Company’s thesis remains solid and it has a potential best in class drug. Merck paid $500M upfront for their candidate prior to Phase 2b data release. Bellus is currently trading at ~$85M. We think the company warrants a $150M valuation (or about $1.25/share). The counter-argument can be made that the next clear catalyst is ~18 months away (mid-2020 Phase 2 readout), so it will be dead money until then. Given the cash buffer and solid data, we are holding.

One or more of PropThink's contributors are LONG BLUSF

Access This Content Now
Sign Up Now!